Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Every once in a while I come across something that deserves broader distribution than it is getting. Whether you are familiar with the particular letter mentioned in this article, or not, (a link is provided if you want to read it, but I warn you - it's vile) you are aware of Dr. Dobson and the influence he has had among evangelical Christians in the past few elections. Dobson's letter went out to all on his mailing list about a week ago in a last ditch effort to scare folks into voting for McCain. Here is a response to James Dobson's letter by Jim Wallis. What I like about the Wallis response is the hope he holds out for Christianity and for America. If you received a copy of the Dobson letter from a friend, please feel free to copy the Wallis response and return the favor. Just be sure to give credit to Jim Wallis of Sojourners Magazine for his excellent writing.

James Dobson, you owe America an apology. The fictional letter released through your Focus on the Family Action organization, titled “Letter From 2012 in Obama’s America”, crosses all lines of decent public discourse. In a time of utter political incivility, it shows the kind of negative Christian leadership that has become so embarrassing to so many of your fellow Christians in America. We are weary of this kind of Christian leadership, and that is why so many are forsaking the Religious Right in this election.
.
This letter offers nothing but fear. It apocalyptically depicts terrorist attacks in American cities, churches losing their tax exempt status for not allowing gay marriages, pornography pushed in front of our children, doctors and nurses forced to perform abortions, euthanasia as commonplace, inner-city crime gone wild because of lack of gun ownership, home schooling banned, restricted religious speech, liberal censorship shutting down conservative talk shows, Christian publishers forced out of business, Israel nuked, power blackouts because of environmental restrictions, brave Christian resisters jailed by a liberal Supreme court, and finally, good Christian families emigrating to Australia and New Zealand.

.
It is shocking how thoroughly biblical teachings against slander—misrepresentations that damage another’s reputation—are ignored (Ephesians 4:29-31, Colossians 3:8, Titus 3:2). Such outrageous predictions not only damage your credibility, they slander Barack Obama who, you should remember, is a brother in Christ, and they insult any Christian who might choose to vote for him.
.
Let me make this clear: Christians will be voting both ways in this election, informed by their good faith, and based on their views of what are the best public policies and direction for America. But in utter disrespect for the prayerful discernment of your fellow Christians, this letter stirs their ugliest fears, appealing to their worst impulses instead of their best.
.
Fear is the clear motivator in the letter; especially fear that evangelical Christians might vote for Barack Obama. The letter was very revealing when it suggested that “younger Evangelicals” became the “swing vote” that elected Obama and the results were catastrophic.

.
You make a mistake when you assume that younger Christians don’t care as much as you about the sanctity of life. They do care—very much—but they have a more consistent ethic of life. Both broader and deeper, it is inclusive of abortion, but also of the many other assaults on human life and dignity. For the new generation, poverty, hunger, and disease are also life issues; creation care is a life issue; genocide, torture, the death penalty, and human rights are life issues; war is a life issue. What happens to poor children after they are born is also a life issue.
.
The America you helped vote into power has lost its moral standing in the world, and even here at home. The America you told Christians to vote for in past elections is now an embarrassment to Christians around the globe, and to the children of your generation of evangelicals. And the vision of America that you still tell Christians to vote for is not the one that many in a new generation of Christians believes expresses their best values and convictions.
.
Christians should be committed to the kingdom of God, not the kingdom of America, and the church is to live an alternative existence of love and justice, offering a prophetic witness to politics. Elections are full of imperfect choices where we all seek to do what is best for the “common good” by applying the values of our faith as best we can.
.
Dr. Dobson, you of course have the same right as every Christian and every American to vote your own convictions on the issues you most care about, but you have chosen to insult the convictions of millions of other Christians, whose own deeply held faith convictions might motivate them to vote differently than you. This epistle of fear is perhaps the dying gasp of a discredited heterodoxy of conservative religion and conservative politics. But out of that death, a resurrection of biblical politics more faithful to the whole gospel—one that is truly good news—might indeed be coming to life.

2 comments:

Zoilus said...

Ah! I see you did get the memo. I like that response, too, and I'd also like to raise another point. When did the Protestant Church become another authoritarians structure? Its roots are in "protest" to the authoritarian Catholic Church, believing that every Christian has a right to read his or her own Bible, and interpret it in any way he or she sees fit. Why is Dobson now the self-appointed Pope of American Protestantism?

C J Garrett said...

Good question. If you figure that one out, let me know. If you went to the Wallis article at Sojo and read the comments, maybe you saw the one that suggested a 2008 letter be sent back to 200 voters:

How about a letter to 2000 from 2008: world economy staggers from trillions in economic fraud, torture practiced on large scale by the USA, violation of Habeas Corpus, the assertion that the President can sign laws and ignore them, massive surveillance, invasions built on lies, How many would have signed up for this ride? I don't believe these things are conservative or even Republican in origin, they are the product of a distorted us-them worldview that tries to divide peoples and countries as good and evil instead of discerning ideas and actions that are corrosive, unwise and wrong, and opposing them by example and persuasion backed by a willingness to defend the innocent. Before calling others evil we must understand that we all have the potential for good and evil that he who would remove a speck from his bother's eye may first have to deal with the wee log in his own.